Skip to Content
Pop CultureBarbie

Did Mattel Get It Right With the First-Ever ‘Autistic’ Barbie Doll?

Commenters have questioned whether a doll can “look” autistic.

By Precious Fondren
Autistic Barbie Mattel
Photo courtesy of Mattel

Mattel is once again expanding the Barbie universe. This week, the toy company unveiled its first-ever autistic Barbie doll, immediately sparking an online debate about representation, visibility, and whether autism can be expressed through a doll’s design.

According to Mattel, the doll was developed over an 18-month period in collaboration with the Autistic Self Advocacy Network (ASAN), a nonprofit disability rights organization run by and for autistic people. The goal, the company said in a press release, was to create a doll that could authentically reflect experiences individuals on the autism spectrum may relate to.

The doll includes several intentional design elements meant to nod to sensory needs and communication tools commonly used within the autistic community, including elbow and wrist articulation to enable movements such as stimming, hand-flapping, and other gestures that some autistic people use to process sensory information or express excitement. The doll also comes with a pink finger-clip fidget spinner that actually spins, noise-canceling headphones, and a tablet displaying symbol-based Augmentative and Alternative Communication (AAC) apps. 

@morgaanfoley My initial thoughts on autistic Barbie and what I like about her #actuallyautistic #autismawareness ♬ original sound - Morgan Foley🧚‍♀️

Online reaction has been split. Some praised Mattel for attempting thoughtful representation, while others questioned whether the concept itself risks oversimplifying an invisible disability.

TikTok creator Morgan Foley, who is autistic, shared her initial thoughts on the doll in a recent video, highlighting what she saw as meaningful inclusions.

“She comes with an AAC device, which I think is one of the most important things about her, because we need that kind of representation,” Foley said.

Foley also appreciated some of the subtler design choices. She said the slightly averted eye gaze was a “cool little” detail and praised Mattel for moving away from Barbie’s traditional look.

“I’m really happy that they didn’t choose a white, blonde-hair, blue-eyed Barbie, because I think whiteness is so overrepresented in autism spaces,” she said. “It’s really important to show that autism affects everyone.”

@drkristynsommer Autistic Barbie was just released, and I have real concerns about it — not because of intention, but because of impact. As a developmental scientist, I know how children understand identity through play. As an autistic parent, I care deeply about protecting the few spaces where autistic kids aren’t being evaluated or corrected. Barbie has always worked because she’s a blank slate. When we label a doll “autistic,” we risk turning an internal neurological experience into a visual template — and that matters for autistic children, especially girls. This isn’t a takedown of autistic Barbie and your joy being represented in mainstream. But it does question what this teaches, who it serves, and how we could do better. You can hold joy and critique at the same time. Both are allowed. #actuallyautistic #AutisticBarbie #AutismRepresentation #Neurodiversity #AutisticVoices ♬ original sound - Dr Kristyn Sommer

Other creators, however, raised concerns about the implications of visually labeling a doll as autistic. Kristyn Sommer argued that the approach could unintentionally reinforce stereotypes rather than dismantle them.

“When we label a doll ‘autistic,’ we risk turning an internal neurological experience into a visual template — and that matters for autistic children, especially girls,” she wrote in her caption.

“It turns autism into something you can see when it’s not something you can see,” she added. “Representation can do two things. It can affirm some people and define the boundaries for others.”

Whether Mattel “got it right” may ultimately depend on who is holding the doll and what conversations it spurs. This isn’t the only debate about autism representation lately. After much debate, Heated Rivalry author Rachel Reid had to come out and confirm that character Shane Hollander is indeed autistic.